Thursday, August 19, 2010

First Impressions

I rode the bike around my neighborhood all evening yesterday. The odometer and speedometer are primarily in kilometers, so I'm still deciding what unit of measurement to work in. I'd like to keep a pretty close log of rides and data to try and track the health of the system for a few months.

Ride 1StartStopMax
Odometer (km)1237
Voltage7669
Batt. Amps100?
Speed (mph)40

25 km is 15.5 miles, so I'm really happy about the range so far, even if I averaged only 20 or 25 mph. It's certainly no worse than my worst-case scenario. It will interesting to see what range I can get at an average speed of 40 or 50 mph though.

I tried to keep an eye on the PakTrakr:
I could easily accelerate and keep the battery-side amperage at or under 10 amps.
I could maintain 25 mph at about 4 amps.

The PakTrakr seems a bit confused about my battery State of Charge (SoC) at the moment. I followed the instructions and changed the chemistry setting to AGM, which I know to be accurate. Still although it can accurately report the pack voltage, it shows the SoC as being 72% when the pack is at 77 volts. The fuel gauge mode shows a mostly empty tank even though the pack is still around 71 volts. It could be user error - I've reset the display by unplugging the remote several times. As far as I know, everything else is working fine. I love the thing already, but I need to try and correct the issue.

My chargers are not working like I expected either. I'm not sure why, but they don't seem to shut-off, or rather, go into float mode when I think they should. Then again, I'm still a bit unsure what voltage my pack should have when "fully charged". If a fully charged AGM 12 volt battery actually reads 12.8 or 12.9 volts, then my batteries are spot on. The charges just seem to stay on full-blast (and stay hot), even once the pack has reach 77 volts (according to the PakTrakr). It might be that the two, 36 volt chargers are wired in series practically, and so they're interfering with each other's monitoring logic. I guess I could try charging the pack in halves to see if their behavior changes.

The controller only threw one error message while I was actually out riding. This too was probably my fault. After coming to a stop, I went to make a sharp right, which led to a down slope. There was a chug-a-chug feeling that may be mechanical on the bike between the motor, chain, wheel and swing-arm. I felt for a moment that the bike was trying to go sporadically, although not with full-power like a run-away. Somewhere in the chugs and whatever strange throttle inputs I gave it, the controller detected a problem. I only wish I had written the error code down, in case it occurs again or was something I haven't seen yet. A simple re-boot allowed me to keep going. I checked for damage or heat but found nothing. That was mid-way through the ride and it didn't hiccup, so to speak, any more.

In the end, it was super cool cruising around and turning some heads last night. Next thing to do is solve the few remaining mysteries and start people-proofing it so I can leave it in public with confidence.
-Colby

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Road Testing

The bike is now in the city and completely legal, so it's time for road testing.

I'm anxious to find out some stats.
Sitting still, the PakTrakr reports a draw of .2 amps.
With the LED Truck-Lite on low-beam, it shows .4 amps.
High-beam makes it .6 amps.
A quick spin around the neighborhood showed 94+ amps on acceleration but only 29 amps for steady cruising.

It's seriously fun to ride.
It is almost like floating down the road. It's pretty quiet of course, but there is a nice electrical whirring created by the motor at 25 mph. I may need a different drive sprocket to achieve 55 mph. The mirrors may need to be relocated or replaced for safety. The license plate may need to be relocated for preference. Overall though, it's a really cool way to get around.

Pictures and stats to come soon!
-Colby

Monday, August 9, 2010

Sevcon DC Converter

A Small Problem:
My bike has a 12 volt electric system for the lights, gauge cluster and horn. I used a 72V to 12V DC converter to supply power to that 12 volts system. I chose the Sevcon 300W converter and ordered it from ElectricMotorsport.com. My only complaint is that I was not provided a connector or a specifications sheet for the device.

The Solution:
Well, the spec sheet .pdf is easy to find at the manufacturer's website:
The plug was not as easy to find, but I gathered enough clues until I nailed it down. The converter connector is a Mini-Fit, Sr. housing, made by Molex. There are technically three different kinds of housings, but there is only one receptacle that fits all three, so you can place an order with confidence. The only catch is that it may not come with the actual conductive terminals - depends on where you order it from. Luckily, I knew my would not come with terminals, and I was able to find them too.
Part Numbers:
I ordered my plug and terminals from Allied Electronics in Fort Worth.
The Molex part number for a plug is 42816. (need 1)
The Molex part number for a female terminal is 42815. (need 4)
The Allied Electronics part number for a plug is 863-1427.
The Allied Electronics part number for a female terminal is 863-1464.

Additional Info.:
Be aware, if you order from somewhere else, there is an entire series/family of Mini-Fit connectors which include single-row / dual-row and 2 through 8 circuit variations. Also, there is a clip which is molded onto single-row connectors which serves to stop the terminals from backing out. For the record, the receptacle I needed for the converter was a single row, 4 circuit connector. Since it didn't include terminals, I ordered 4 terminals for size 14 or 16 AWG wire. The whole thing goes together really easily and makes a reliable connection to the converter, which was great to see.

Here's the search string to find all members of the series in Allied Electronics' online interface.

Here's a .pdf which explains the parts with images, in case that helps clear up any confusion.

-Colby

Sunday, August 8, 2010

First Test Drive

The bike was finally at a point we could test drive it this weekend, so that's exactly what we did.
It rode pretty smooth, very quiet, and everything went just great.

Check it out:


Several things remain, but registration and inspection are very near.

-Colby

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Controller Grounding

After wiring up the controller, we found that the chassis was being grounded somewhere. We weren't sure if this was normal or not or good or not so I researched it.

Kelly User Manuals:
Version 2.3 of the Kelly user manual specifically mentions not connecting B- to GND on pages 10 and 11 (sideways footnote), but in this instance, I believe they are referring to the GND pin on the front and rear panels which is simply a ground connection for input and output sensors. So this doesn't answer my question. However, version 3.1 of the Kelly user manual specifically mentions it being preferable to wire B- to the chassis on page 9.

The Forums:
I signed up for ElMoto.net recently and today I was in the chat room when a couple guys joined: RC and Guff. We got to talking about my bike and I asked about this issue. Each said their bike has neither the low-voltage system (12 volts) nor the high-voltage system (72 volts in my case) grounded to the chassis. When I asked about how to accomplish that with respect to the high-voltage components, at least two solutions were mentioned. I guessed that plastic screws / washers were required, because that's what Lennon did. However, RC mentioned using polycarbonate board, which serves as an insulator. Without using special hardware, a component can be mounted to a sheet of polycarbonate or something like "garolite" and the sheet then mounted to the chassis. This isolates the two, so even if the component isn't internally isolated from its outer casing that won't leak on the bike chassis. For the low-voltage components, I've read posts about running new ground wires to the lights and horn instead of using the chassis.

After chatting with them a while, I searched more and found these threads agreeing with their input
Additional threads:
  • ElMoto.net, Thread 2167 - Main high-voltage components / grounding
  • DIY Electric Car, Thread 14817 - Kelly KDH14500 wiring / grounding
  • V is for Voltage, Thread 4066 - Kelly refund & exchange policies / testimonials
That last thread mentions something interesting: The author of post #5 in states that High-voltage Kelly controllers are not insulated from the chassis ground while low-voltage controllers are insulated from the chassis ground. That might have been the case in July of 2008, but I'm not sure it is still reliable information, and I don't know which controllers he's considering high or low-voltage.

The issue:
Safety is the main deciding factor here. If the bike chassis is grounded to the pack, then (depending on exactly what you touch) you could complete a circuit with your body or with a tool and damage yourself and your bike. I don't feel great about ignoring what the controller manual says, but I'd rather the bike be safe to work on than dangerous because of what could be a poor translation in the manual.

For the record:
Strangely, while researching, I stumbled upon a thread about using a Kelly controller in some Z20 model scooter, and then a completely separate thread referencing the first, concerning (rather questioning) Kelly, their product and their service.
  1. V is for Voltage, Thread 3714 - Moving to a Kelly controller for Z20b
  2. DIY Electric Car, Thread 16961 - Kelly controller quality
I guess the guy whom started that thread on DIY was in a hurry or failed to notice the picture was not of a Kelly manufactured model, but of some controller being provided for electric scooters by some dealer. Anyway, for the record, I've had no problem with Kelly, nor with my Kelly controller (it's been in use for one week). While chatting on ElMoto.net, one member mentioned his Kelly controller has been working just fine for 6 months. My only complaint is about the lack of clarity within Kelly's manual and wiin replies to questions via email. I've emailed sales@kellycontroller.com a couple times regarding both sales and technical wiring support and have always received quick responses. If you can be patient and don't mind reading and thinking a bit, I imagine Kelly will do right by you. If you do email them, use direct and very clear language to ask individual questions. That's what has worked for me. I haven't read about any instances of faulty Kelly controllers, though you do have to seriously study the user manual provided. Even in cases where a controller gets cooked because of user error, it seems they often replace the controller or offer to repair it, usually only for the cost of shipping.

On another side note, ElMoto.net has been a great resource so far. The users seem down to earth and willing to help newbies like myself. There's a lot to figure out, and it seems every bike is slightly different. Starting a thread for my project has helped quite a bit already.

-Colby

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Rotation

It was a big day for the bike.
The motor turned for the first time today.

I've been making good progress at figuring out wiring details in the past weeks and we finally got to a point where we could pretty safely test the contactor, controller, motor and throttle. It seems to work, which is really exciting. The controller was programmed to greatly limit is output and after minor troubleshooting, the controller's LED showed it was ready and without errors. It's a bit jerry-rigged at the moment, but we'll be making more permanent connections soon in order to do test runs and get it inspected.

Here are a couple pictures of the controller. Like I said, jerry-rigged for testing!

Rear Panel:



Front Panel:



-Colby

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Pre-Charge Resistors

The name itself says a lot, but honestly, until I went to wire up my motor controller for the first time, I had no idea I needed one, nor why.

What:
The pre-charge resistor does just that - it allows for charging of the capacitors in the motor controller prior to the closing of a of high-current switch or contactor.

How:
Simply put, the pre-charge resistor allows the motor controller capacitors to be in a circuit with the main battery pack even though the contactor is open (not completing a circuit). This by-passing of the contactor allows the motor controller capacitors to stay charged, sometimes called "fully formed". There's a catch involved here related to the importance of selecting the correct resistor for a certain system, so please read this entire post to be aware of important details.

Where:
The pre-charge resistor is wired "across" the main terminals of the contactor. That is (equivalently), one end of the resistor on the battery's positive terminal and the other end of the resistor on the controller's positive battery terminal. Being in parallel with the contactor allows for the "bypassing" (as I call it) of the contactor. Check the documentation on your own motor controller as some may already have a pre-charge resistor internally, but my Kelly KD72401 does not.

Why:
When a contactor "closes" (to complete a circuit), the amount of current which immediately tries to pass between the contacts affects the life of those contacts. In the case of EVs, uncharged capacitors in a motor controller can draw such an in-rush of current, the contacts will arc, creating pits in their surface (which reduces usable contact surface) or perhaps even welding the contacts together. Furthermore, the capacitors themselves can be damaged by such an in-rush current. On the other hand, capacitors that have been mostly pre-charged will draw a much smaller in-rush current, which limits arcing of the contacts and increases the longevity, reliability and performance of the contactor as well as the motor controller.

Don't miss the point:
It is possible to render this component useless so please still be cautious. This is exactly why I like to know what each component does and how...

Many builders put a master on/off switch (in addition to the contactor) capable of handling 300+ amps for manually opening the main battery circuit as a safety measure or convenience. If such a master switch is present, it will of course allow the motor controller capacitors to discharge over time, which is probably normal. The only dangerous part is when the system is wired such that the contactor can be closed while the master switch is off. With the capacitors uncharged, if the contactor and then the master switch is closed, then the pre-charge resistor will not have an opportunity to function. The path of least resistance will be from the batteries, through the master switch, through the closed contactor, and straight into the capacitors. Those capacitors will attempt to charge almost instantaneously and may be damaged in the process.

One fix in this situation is to install another pre-charge resistor, this time for the master switch. This will allow the motor controller capacitors to always be charged and ready - making the contactor's job (and the controller's job) less stressful.


What exactly:
Now that we know their purpose and value, lets take a practical example for application to your own project.

According to the Alltrax Lessons Learned document, the resistance of the pre-charge resistor should be selected based upon battery pack voltage. In my case, 72 volts implies a 1000 ohm, 10 W resistor. The resistor with which Kelly Controllers provided me is only a 300 ohm, 10 W resistor. To know whether or not that will suffice, I checked the following calculations:

Peak in-rush current can be determined by battery pack voltage divided by Equivalent Series Resistance (ESR) of the capacitor bank. This might be measurable on the controller with a digital ohm-meter. Assuming the bank is made of 10 capacitors, each with a resistance of .05 to .5 ohms, the bank's total ESR would be .005 to .05 ohms. Thus, without the pre-charge resistor, 72 volts / .005 ohms = 14,400 amps. The capacitors probably aren't rated for that, so even though it's just the peak and only experience for an instant, it could cause one or more capacitors to short-out internally.

With the pre-charge resistor, the peak in-rush current is 72 volts / 300.005 ohms = .24 amps. Therefore, the peak dissipation in the pre-charge resistor is 72 volts * .24 amps = 17.28 watts.
That's almost twice the 10 watt rating of the provided resistor, but it might be alright since that's just the peak dissipation which falls quickly from 17.27 to 10 watts in around .275 seconds.

Using the rule of thumb that a capacitor is 99.3% charged after 5RC seconds lets us estimate how much time the motor controller capacitors should be given to be (close to) fully charged, where R is resistance and C is capacitance. Assuming the motor controller has a total capacitance of 3300 uF, 5RC = 5 * 300 ohms * (3300*10^-6 farads) = 4.95 seconds.

One member of the diyelectriccar forum suggested selecting the pre-charge resistor based on the size of the battery pack - that is, based on its voltage. He stated a resistor with 1 ohm for every 1 volt of potential difference will result in a current of 1 amp (72 volts / 72 ohms = 1 amp). Also then, 72 volts * 1 amp = 72 watts, which sure sounds like a lot more power dissipation. I don't know much about the chemistry and makeup of resistors, but the guy stated that because the pre-charge was going to take so little time, a sand-filled 10W resistor would probably work. The time calculation checked out, as 5RC = 5*72 ohms *.003300 farads = 1.19 seconds, but I don't know for sure that the resistor I was given is sand-filled. Then again, I'm not sure about my motor controller's total capacitance either, so there are still plenty of variables.

Conclusion:
In the end, the objective is to protect your investment, as well as your own well-being. The critical issue is to make sure the controller always has an opportunity to pre-charge (at an appropriate rate and as completely as practical) to full drive power before closing that last high-current switch.

References:

Graphing / Analysis of RC Circuits